Radiation Dose Reduction as an Objective Marker of Procedural Maturation During Early Neurointerventional Fellowship Training A Six-Month Longitudinal Study
Article Sidebar
-
Fellowship, Fluoroscopy time, Neurointervention, Procedural learning curve, Radiation dose
Abstract
Highlight:
- Radiation dose declined progressively during early neurointerventional training
- Radiation dose has a clearer temporal trend than fluoroscopy time in early training
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Radiation safety is a fundamental component of neurointerventional practice and competency-based fellowship training. While fluoroscopy time has traditionally been used as a surrogate marker of procedural efficiency, it may not accurately reflect total radiation exposure. Dose-related metrics may better represent technical maturation and radiation-conscious procedural behavior during fellowship progression. Objective: This study compared fluoroscopy time and radiation dose to characterize the early learning curve of neurointerventional fellowship training. Method: This retrospective observational study analyzed 108 consecutive DSA-based brain angiograms performed during the first six months of a supervised fellowship. Chronological case-sequence linear regression was employed to evaluate longitudinal changes in radiation dose and fluoroscopy time. Result: The mean fluoroscopic radiation dose decreased by 42.8%, dropping from 170.17 mGy in month 1 to 97.36 mGy in month 6. Linear regression revealed a significant negative association between case sequence and radiation dose (B = -0.468 mGy/case; p = 0.012; R2 = 0.058). In contrast, fluoroscopy time showed only modest fluctuations and no significant linear association (p = 0.780). Conclusion: During early fellowship training, fluoroscopic radiation dose demonstrates a clearer temporal trend than fluoroscopy time, suggesting it is a more informative marker of procedural maturation. However, the low explanatory power and the absence of adjustment for procedural complexity require cautious interpretation. These findings warrant further research incorporating complexity-adjusted designs to better define technical maturation.
Full text article
References
1. Skripochnik E, Loh SA. Fluoroscopy time is not accurate as a surrogate for radiation exposure. Vascular. 2017;25(5):466-471. DOI: 10.1177/17085381176983 42
2. European Alliance for Medical Radiation Protection Research (EURAMED). Medical application of ionising radiation and radiation protection in neurovascular diseases. 2022. [Report]
3. Hassan AE, Amelot S. Radiation exposure during neurointerventional procedures in modern biplane angiographic systems: A single-site experience. Interv Neurol. 2017;6(3-4):105-116. DOI: 10.1159/000456 622.
4. International Atomic Energy Agency. Patient dose optimization in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. 2010. [Web Page]
5. Wunderle KA, Balter S. Patient radiation dosimetry for fluoroscopically guided interventions: a review of the history and limitations. Med Phys. 2026;53(1):e70211. DOI: 10.1002/mp.70211.
6. Paulo G, Bartal G, Vano E. Radiation dose of patients in fluoroscopically guided interventions: An update. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44(6):842-848. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02667-3.
7. Zhao LB, Miyachi S, Shi HB, Suh DC. Comparison of medical education and requirements for training in the interventional neuroradiology in China, Japan and Korea. Neurointervention. 2013;8(1):3-8. DOI:10.5469 /neuroint.2013.8.1.3.
8. Andersson J, Bednarek DR, Bolch W, Boltz T, Bosmans H, et al. Estimation of patient skin dose in fluoroscopy: Summary of a joint report by AAPM TG357 and EFOMP. Med Phys. 2021;48(7):e671-e696. DOI: 10.10 02/mp.14910.
9. Pannell JS, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Wali AR, Hirshman BR, Steinberg JA, et al. Simulator-based angiography and endovascular neurosurgery curriculum: A Longitudinal evaluation of performance following simulator-based angiography training. Cureus. 2016;8(8):e756. DOI:10. 7759/cureus.756
10. Kreiser K, Gehling KG, Ströber L, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS.
Simulation training in neuroangiography: Transfer to reality. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(8):1184–1191. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02479-5
11. Niimi J, Nakamura H, Ueda K, Yokoyama D, Tasaka K, et al. Investigation of fluoroscopy time and radiation dose by the number of cerebral angiography operator experiences. J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(4):187-191. DOI: 10.5797/jnet.2021-0043.oa
12. Ihn YK, Kim B, Jeong HW, Suh SH, Won YD, Lee YJ, et al. Monitoring radiation doses during diagnostic and therapeutic neurointerventional procedures: multicenter study for establishment of reference levels. Neurointervention. 2021;16(3):240-251. DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2021.00437
13. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2022 Tentang Bantuan Biaya Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Fellowship. 2022. [Statute]
14. Sowa MS, Sowa J, Węglarz KA, Budzanowski M. Radiation dose metrics and local diagnostic reference levels in low-dose stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Med. 2026;15(5):2059. DOI: 10.3390 /jcm15052059
15. Li X, Hirsch JA, Rehani MM, Yang K, Liu B. Effective dose assessment for patients undergoing contemporary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(1):158-170. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21804
16. Kirisattayakul W, Pattum P, Munkong W, Prabsattro T, Khottapat C, et al. Comparing Radiation Dose of Cerebral Angiography Using Conventional and High kV Techniques: A Retrospective Study on Intracranial Aneurysm Patients and a Phantom Study. Tomography. 2023;9(2):621–632. DOI: 10.3390/tomo graphy9020050
17. Hachiya K, Chida K, Matsuda Y. Radiation Dose Reduction through the optimization of mask images in cerebral angiography. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2024;80(4):365–373. DOI: 10.6009/jjrt. 2024-1386
18. Wali AR, Pathuri S, Brandel MG, Sindewald RW, Hirshman BR, et al. Reducing frame rate and pulse rate for routine diagnostic cerebral angiography: ALARA principles in practice. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2024;26(1):46-50. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.202 3.E2023.01.007.
19. Bhatt SK, Gupta V, Bhatia V, Khandelwal N, Bansal SC, et al. Patient radiation doses during diagnostic cerebral angiography procedures: experience at a tertiary level center of India. J Postgrad Med Edu Res. 2019;53(2):69-71. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1315
20. Song Y, Han S, Kim BJ, Oh SH, Kim JS, et al. Low-dose fluoroscopy protocol for diagnostic cerebral angiography. Neurointervention. 2020;15(2):67-73. DOI:10.5469/neuroint.2020.00129
21. Schneider T, Wyse E, Pearl MS. Analysis of radiation doses incurred during diagnostic cerebral angiography after the implementation of dose reduction strategies. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(4):384-388. DOI: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2015-012204
22. Yi HJ, Sung JH, Lee DH, Kim SW, Lee SW. Analysis of radiation doses and dose reduction strategies during cerebral digital subtraction angiography. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:216-223. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu. 2017.01.004.
23. Bundy JJ, McCracken IW, Shin DS, Monroe EJ, Johnson GE, et al. Fluoroscopically-guided interventions with radiation doses exceeding 5000 mGy reference point air kerma: A dosimetric analysis of 89,549 interventional radiology, neurointerventional radiology, vascular surgery, and neurosurgery encounters. CVIR Endovasc. 2020;3(1):69. DOI: 10.11 86/s42155-020-00159-6
24. Suh SH. Striving to improve image quality and minimize radiation dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neurointervention. 2025;20:49-51. DOI: 10.5469/ neuroint.2025.00311.
25. Pearl MS, Torok C, Wang J, Wyse E, Mahesh M, et al. Practical techniques for reducing radiation exposure during cerebral angiography procedures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(2):141-145. DOI: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2013-010982.
26. Martin CJ. Eye lens dosimetry for fluoroscopically guided clinical procedures: practical approaches to protection and dose monitoring. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):286-291. DOI: 10.1093/ rpd/ncv431
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Pinto Desti Ramadhoni, Lenny Octavinawaty, Diah Andini, Budiman Juniwijaya, Natasya Wanda Yuniza, Nurdiansyah Nurdiansyah, Dewie Susan, Ardy Oktaviandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.