Two Strikes in the Cath Lab Lessons from Repeat Aneurysm Ruptures During Endovascular Treatment

Vita Kusuma Rahmawati (1) , Achmad Firdaus Sani (2) , Dedy Kurniawan (2) , Faishol Hamdani (3) , Muh. Wildan Yahya (4)
(1) Department of Neurology, dr. Haryoto General Hospital, Lumajang, Indonesia,
(2) Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga; Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia,
(3) Department of Neurology, Bangil General Hospital, Bangil, Indonesia,
(4) Department of Neurology, Kabupaten Kediri General Hospital, Kediri, Indonesia

Abstract

Highlight:



  1. Repeat aneurysm rupture during endovascular therapy is rare but often fatal

  2. This case highlights the need for careful hydrocephalus management and monitoring

  3. Dynamic neurological assessment guides urgent aneurysm repair and improves outcomes


ABSTRACT


Introduction: Repeat aneurysmal rupture in the catheterization laboratory remains a critical concern, with periprocedural mortality rates reported as high as 63%. Such rebleeding requires rapid multidisciplinary decision-making, particularly in high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) complicated by hydrocephalus. Case: A 56-year-old hypertensive man presented with sudden-onset headache followed by loss of consciousness (Hunt and Hess grade III). Computed tomography (CT) revealed subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage, and CT angiography identified a left saccular posterior communicating artery aneurysm. During induction in the catheterization laboratory, he developed severe headache, seizures, hypertension, and pupil anisocoria, raising concern for impending cerebral herniation. Owing to a postictal comatose state, his clinical Hunt and Hess grade deteriorated to grade V. Emergent CT confirmed acute hydrocephalus and rebleeding. Endovascular coiling was deferred, and an external ventricular drain was placed, resulting in improved consciousness. Subsequent angiography demonstrated contrast extravasation from the aneurysm dome, confirming rebleeding. The aneurysm ruptured three times over two weeks, including twice during separate catheterization laboratory sessions. Definitive endovascular coiling ultimately achieved near-complete aneurysm packing. Neurological status improved to Hunt and Hess grade II, followed by ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. At discharge, the modified Rankin Scale score improved from 4 to 3 without new focal neurological deficits. Three-month follow-up confirmed stable neurological recovery. Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges of repeated aSAH rupture in the catheterization laboratory, emphasizing hydrocephalus management and dynamic Hunt and Hess grading to guide aneurysm treatment timing. Urgent endovascular coiling may be warranted despite clinical instability, using individualized strategies to optimize neurological outcomes.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

1. Aoki K, Murayama Y, Tanaka Y, Ishibashi T, Irie K, Fuga M, et al. Risk factors and management of intraprocedural rupture during coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Role of balloon guiding catheter. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1343137. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1343137

2. Baldvinsdóttir B, Klurfan P, Eneling J, Ronne-Engström E, Enblad P, Lindvall P, et al. Adverse events during endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms: A prospective nationwide study on subarachnoid hemorrhage in Sweden. Brain Spine. 2023;3:102708. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102708

3. Klisch J, Weyerbrock A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Active bleeding from ruptured cerebral aneurysms during diagnostic angiography: Emergency treatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(10):2062-5.

4. Lim YC, Kim CH, Kim YB, Joo JY, Shin YS, Chung J. Incidence and Risk Factors for Rebleeding during Cerebral Angiography for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(2):403-409. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.2.403

5. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Chou SH, Cruz-Flores S, Dangayach NS, et al. 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023;54(7):e314-70. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000436

6. Al‐Mufti F, Dicpinigaitis AJ, Bowers CA, Claassen J, Park S, Agarwal S, et al. Prognostication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: The modified hunt and hess grading scale. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2024;4(5):e001349. DOI: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001349

7. Wilson CD, Safavi-Abbasi S, Sun H, Kalani MY, Zhao YD, Levitt MR, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of risk factors for shunt dependency after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(2):586-95. DOI: 10.3171/20 15.11.JNS152094

8. Nikova AS, Sioutas GS, Sfyrlida K, Tripsianis G, Karanikas M, Birbilis T. Oculomotor nerve palsy due to posterior communicating artery aneurysm: clipping vs coiling. Neurochirurgie. 2022;68(1):86-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.03.012

9. Finger G, Martins OG, Nesi WM, Casarin MC, de Almeida LP, Schiavo FL, et al. Ruptured aneurysm in the posterior communicating segment of carotid artery presenting with contralateral oculomotor nerve palsy. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:177. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_203_2019

10. Güresir E, Schuss P, Setzer M, Platz J, Seifert V, Vatter H. Posterior communicating artery aneurysm–related oculomotor nerve palsy: Influence of surgical and endovascular treatment on recovery: Single-center series and systematic review. Neurosurg. 2011 Jun 1;68(6):1527-34. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820edd82

11. Rojas-Panta G, Reyes-Narro GF, Toro-Huamanchumo C, Choque-Velasquez J, Saal-Zapata G. Prognostic value of scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Report of a reference center in Peru. Neurocirugía (Engl Ed). 2024;35(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2023.05. 001

12. Couret D, Boussen S, Cardoso D, Alonzo A, Madec S, Reyre A, et al. Comparison of scales for the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study. Eur Radiol. 2024;34(11):7526-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10814-4

13. Munasinghe T, Huang H, Phan T, Lai L. Timing of aneurysm repair after subarachnoid haemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ultra-early and early intervention. J Clin Neurosci. 2025;141:111623. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111623

14. Lylyk P, lylyk I, Bleise C, Scrivano E, Lylyk PN, Beneduce B, et al. Management of intractable hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with the eShunt® system endovascular CSF shunt (S16. 004). Neurol. 2024;102(7 Supplement 1):7184 DOI: 10.1212/ WNL.0000000000208335

15. Loconi-Vallejos A, Jorge-Dejo C, Azurín-Peña M, Garcia-Solorzano FO. Timing of aneurysm treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage and grade of functional capacity at discharge: A retrospective cohort study. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosurg. 2023;59(1):89. DOI: 10.1186/s41983-023-00692-w

Authors

Vita Kusuma Rahmawati
Achmad Firdaus Sani
achmad-f-s@fk.unair.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Dedy Kurniawan
Faishol Hamdani
Muh. Wildan Yahya
Rahmawati, V. K., Sani, A. F., Kurniawan, D., Hamdani, F., & Yahya, M. W. (2026). Two Strikes in the Cath Lab: Lessons from Repeat Aneurysm Ruptures During Endovascular Treatment . Journal of Neurointervention and Stroke, 2(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.63937/jnevis-2026.21.19

Article Details

No Related Submission Found